Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
The eastward spread of Thomas Aquinas' theological thought can be regarded as a path of "endogenous construction". It integrated into the internal logic of Catholic theology and philosophy in the Ming and Qing Dynasties of China based on its inherent theories and theological purposes and became a core resource for the construction of this philosophical system. Meanwhile, it was adjusted for localization in combination with the context of traditional Chinese philosophy. Therefore, it played a foundational role in the construction of Catholic theology and philosophy especially the Theory of Human Nature in the Ming and Qing Dynasties of China. Matteo Ricci's Tian Zhu Shi Yi and Giulio Aleni's Xing Xue Cu Shu are typical texts introducing Thomas Aquinas' theological thought. Especially in terms of the theory of soul and the theory of human nature,Tian Zhu Shi Yi basically inherits Aquinas' tradition of natural theology; Xing Xue Cu Shu realizes a systematic introduction to the Aristotelian-Thomistic theory of soul by using the expression of China's native "Xing Xue"; furthermore, Xing Shuo by Xia Dachang, a Confucian Catholic, initially constructed the "spiritual theory of human nature" by "adopting" Aquinas' theory of soul and integrating it with Confucianism's "theory of the goodness of human nature". Regarding the "endogenous construction" of Thomas Aquinas' thought, we need to pay attention not only to its role as a foundational cornerstone but also, more importantly, to its evolutionary characteristics in China and the responses from local scholars.
References
Che Xiangqian, From Sacred Doctrine to Confucian Moral Practice: Giulio Aleni’s Cross-Cultural Interpretation of “Goodness and Evil of Human Nature”, Religions, Vol 15, Issue 8. 2024, pp. 1007-1007.
Chen Cui, Integration and Symbiosis: Medievalism in Giulio Aleni’s Translation of Catholic Liturgy in Late Imperial China, Religions. Vol 16, Issue 8. 2025, pp. 1006-1006.
Huang Zhipeng, Encounter between Soul and Human Nature: An Examination of Xia Dachang's “Xingshuo”, Front. Philos. China ,2019, pp.264-283.
LIU Sumin, Chinese Research in Medieval Philosophy: Retrospects and Prospects, Front. Philos. China, 2018, pp.120‒138.
Thierry Meynard，Overlooked Connection Between Two Jesuit Treatises on the Soul in Japan and China: Gómez's Short Compendium (1593) and Aleni's Xingxue Cushu (c.1640),Month Review of Philosophy and Culture,2020, pp.23 – 40.
Vincent Shen, From Aristotle’s De Anima to Xia Dachang’s Xingshuo, in Journal of Chinese Philosophy, Oxford: Blackwell, Vol.32, 2005.
Yang, Myung-Soo, Aquinas’ Theology in The True Meaning of the Lord of Heaven(T’ien-chu shih-I) and Critique of Matteo Ricci’s Understanding of Neo-Confucianism –A Comparison of the Christian God and Neo-Confucian Li，CHUL HAK SA SANG : Journal of Philosophical Ideas. Vol 28,2008, pp.161-211.
傅乐安。《托马斯•阿奎那基督教哲学》。上海：上海人民出版社，1990。[FU Lean. Thomas Aquinas Jidujiao Zhexue. Shanghai: Shanghai People's Publishing House,1990.]
黄兴涛、王国荣编。《明清之际西学文本：50种重要文献汇编》。北京：中华书局，2013。[HUANG Xingtao and WANG Guorong. eds. Mingqing Zhiji Xixue Wenben: Compilation of 50 Important Documents. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju,2013.]
纪建勋。《汉语神学的滥觞——早期全球化时代的上帝之赌》。香港：道风书社，2020。[JI Jiangxun. Proving God in China: A Comparative Study of the Views of God in the Age of Early Globalization. HongKong: Dao Feng Publishing,2020.]
利玛窦（Matteo Ricci）著，梅谦立注，谭杰校勘。《天主实义今注》。北京：商务印书馆，2014。[Matteo Ricci. Notes on the Tianzhu Shiyi. Annotated by Thierry Meynard, Collated by Tan Jie. Beijing: The Commercial Press,2014.]
沈清松。《从利玛窦到海德格尔：跨文化脉络下的中西哲学互动》。台北：商务印书馆，2014。[Vincent Shen. From Matteo Ricci to Martin Heidegger: The Interaction between Chinese and Western Philosophies in the Context of Cross – Culture. Taipei: The Commercial Press,2014.]
圣多玛斯·阿奎那著St. Thomas Aquinas。周克勤等译。《神学大全》Summa Theologiae。台南：中华道明会碧岳学社联合出版，2008。[St. Thomas Aquinas. Translated by Zhou Keqin. Summa Theologiae. Tai Nan：Sino-Catholic Publishing House，2008. ]
钟鸣旦、杜鼎克主编。《耶稣会罗马档案馆明清天主教文献》第10册。台北：台北利氏学社，2002。[Nicolas Standaert & Adrian Dudink, eds. Chinese Christian texts from the Roman Archives of the Society of Jesus. Vol.10. Taipei: Ricci Institute, Taipei,2002.]
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.