Supplementary Files
Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
This article addresses the terminology of “love” in Book I of Augustine’s De Doctrina Christiana. From the perspective of biblical hermeneutics, it aims to demonstrate how Augustine, by shifting the terminology from dilectio to caritas, endows “love” with three progressive layers of meaning within the interpretation of the Bible: love as action, love as relation, and love as substance. Beginning with his treatment of the “commandment of love” in the Gospel of Matthew within the dichotomy of usus-fruitio(use-enjoy), Augustine leads dilectio, as an action, toward caritas, as a relation. He thereby establishes that the central task of biblical hermeneutics is “enhancing love”, and the connotation of dilectio in terms of action is subsumed into caritas. Ultimately, Augustine alludes to the substantial nature of caritas which integrates both action and relation. This substantiality is explicitly manifested in the proposition that “the Holy Spirit is love,” through which caritas acquires the power to fortify the authority of Scripture. Therefore, caritas becomes the ultimate end of Augustine’s biblical hermeneutics.
References
Andrews, James A. Hermeneutics and the Church: In Dialogue with Augustine. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2012.
Augustine. Confessionum libri XIII. Edited by Lucas Verheijen. Corpus Christianorum Series Latina, vol. 27. Turnholt: Brepols, 1981.
Augustine. De Civitate Dei. Edited by Bernard Dombart and Alphonse Kalb. Corpus Christianorum Series Latina, vol. 47. Turnholt: Brepols, 1955.
Augustine. De Doctrina Christiana. Edited by Bernard Dombart and Alphonse Kalb. Corpus Christianorum Series Latina, vol. 32. Turnholt: Brepols, 1962.
Augustine. De Trinitate. Edited by Bernard Dombart and Alphonse Kalb. Corpus Christianorum Series Latina, vol. 50 and 50A. Turnholt: Brepols, 1968.
Bergjan, Silke-Petra. “Die Liebe zu Gott als erste Regel der Schriftauslegung. Tyconius und die Struktur von Augustin, De doctrina christiana.” In Marburger Theologische Studien 85, edited by Peter Gmeinhardt and Uwe Kühneweg, 65–76. Marburg: N. G. Elwert Verlag, 2004.
Bray, Gerald. “Augustine’s Key.” Christian History 22, no. 4 (2003): 42–44.
Brechtken, Josef. Augustinus Doctor Caritatis: Sein Liebesbegriff im Widerspruch von Eigennutz und selbstloser Güte im Rahmen der antiken Glückseligkeits-Ethik. Meisenheim am Glan: Verlag Anton Hain, 1975.
Bruns, Gerald L. Hermeneutics Ancient and Modern. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992.
Burnaby, John. Amor Dei: A Study of the Religion of St. Augustine. Eugene: Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2007.
Canning, Raymond. “The Distinction between Love for God and Love for Neighbour in St. Augustine.” Augustiniana 32, no. 1/2 (1982): 5–41.
Canning, Raymond. “The Augustinian uti/frui Distinction in the Relation between Love for Neighbour and Love for God.” Augustiniana 33, no. 3/4 (1983): 165–231.
Canning, Raymond. “Love of Neighbour in St. Augustine: A preparation for or the essential moment of Love for God.” Augustiniana 33, no. 1/2 (1983): 5–57.
Canning, Raymond. “‘Love your Neighbour as Yourself’ (Matt. 22. 39): Saint Augustine on the lineaments of the self to be loved.” Augustiniana 34, no. 1/2 (1984): 145–197.
Cary, Phillip. Outward Signs: The Powerlessness of External Things in Augustine's Thought. Oxford University Press, 2008.
Clark, Gillian. “Caritas: Augustine on love and Fellow Feeling.” In Hope, Joy, and Affection in the Classical World, edited by Ruth R. Caston and Robert A. Kaster, 209–225. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
Eden, Kathy. “The Rhetorical Tradition and Augustinian Hermeneutics in De Doctrina Christiana.” Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric 8, no. 1 (1990): 45–63.
Ford, Matthew J. “For the love of God: An analysis of the hermeneutical principles, and practices, and their development, in Augustine's On Christian Teaching, The Spirit and the Letter, The Literal Meaning of Genesis and The Enchiridion.” MTh(R) thesis, Free Church College, 2010.
Gramigna, Remo. Augustine’s Theory of Signs, Signification, and Lying. Vol. 60. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2020.
Harasta, Eva. “Gemeinsam in Christus. Die »Einheit« von Nächstenliebe und Gottesliebe nach Augustin und Karl Barth.” Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie 48, no. 4 (2007): 445–459.
Harmless, William, ed. Augustine in His Own Words. Washington: The Catholic University of America Press, 2010.
Harrison, Carol. “Doxology and Loving Knowledge in Augustine’s De Doctrina Christiana Book 1.” Supplement Series for the Journal of Religion and Society 15 (2018): 138–156.
Holte, Ragnar. Béatitude et Sagesse: Saint Augustin et le problème de la fin de l'homme dans la philosophie ancienne. Paris: Études augustiniennnes, 1962.
Hubbard, Kyle P. “Augustine on Human Love for God: Agape, Eros, or Philia?” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 86, no. 2 (2012): 203–222.
Jackson, B. Darrel. “The theory of signs in St. Augustine’s De doctrina Christiana.” Revue d’Etudes Augustiniennes et Patristiques 15, no. 1-2 (1969): 9–49.
Markus, R. A. “St. Augustine on Signs.” Phronesis 2, no. 1 (1957): 60–83.
Mayer, Cornelius. Die Zeichen in der geistigen Entwicklung und in der Theologie des jungen Augustinus. Würzburg: Augustinus-Verlag, 1969.
Mayer, Cornelius. “‘Res per signa’. Der Grundgedanke des Prologs in Augustins Schrift De doctrina christiana und das Problem seiner Datierung.” Revue d'Etudes Augustiniennes et Patristiques 20, no. 1-2 (1974): 100–112.
Murad, Yasser. “Sprache und Wahrheit. Zeichentheorie und Illuminationslehre bei Augustinus.” PhD diss., Universität Tübingen, 2011.
O’Donovan, Oliver. The Problem of Self-Love in St. Augustine. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1980.
O’Donovan, Oliver. “‘Usus’ and ‘Fruitio’ in Augustine, ‘De Doctrina Christiana I.’” The Journal of Theological Studies 33, no. 2 (1982): 361–397.
Owens, Bryant K. “The Role of Caritas in The Hermeneutic of Saint Augustine and Its Impact on Philosophical and Theological Hermeneutics.” PhD diss., Faulkner University, 2018.
Pollmann, Karla. “Augustine’s Hermeneutics as a Universal Discipline!?” In Augustine and the Disciplines: From Cassiciacum to Confessions, edited by Karla Pollmann and Mark Vessey, 206–231. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
Pollmann, Karla. Doctrina Christiana: Untersuchungen zu den Anfängen der christlichen Hermeneutik unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Augustinus, De doctrina christiana. Freiburg: Universitätsverlag, 1996.
Ruef, Hans. Augustin über Semiotik und Sprache: Sprachtheoretische Analysen zu Augustins Schrift “De Dialectica” mit einer deutschen Übersetzung. Bern: K. J. Wyss Erben AG, 1981.
Schaff, Philip, and Henry Wace, eds. A Select Library of Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church. Vol. 2. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1999.
Sieben, Hermann-Josef. “Die ‘res’ der Bibel. Eine Analyse von ‘De doctrina christiana I-III’.” Revue d'Etudes Augustiniennes et Patristiques 21, no. 1-2 (1975): 72–90.
Toom, Tarmo. “Hermeneutics in Augustine’s De Doctrina Christiana Books Two and Three.” Patristic Theology 1 (2024): 101–134.
Vance, Eugene. Mervelous Signals: Poetics and Sign Theory in the Middle Ages. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1989.
Williams, Thomas. “Biblical interpretation.” In The Cambridge Companion to Augustine, edited by Eleonore Stump and Norman Kretzmann, 59–70. London: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
奥古斯丁。《论灵魂及其起源》。石敏敏译。北京：中国社会科学出版社，2017。[Augustine. On the Soul and Its Origin. Translated by Shi Minmin. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press, 2017.]
奥古斯丁。《论三位一体》。周伟驰译。上海：上海人民出版社，2007。[Augustine. On the Trinity. Translated by Zhou Weichi. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Press, 2007.]
汉娜·阿伦特。《爱与圣奥古斯丁》。王寅丽，池伟添译。桂林：漓江出版社，2019。[Arendt, Hannah. Love and Saint Augustine. Translated by Wang Yinli and Chi Weitian. Guilin: Lijiang Publishing, 2019.]
渠冉、屠友祥。《奥古斯丁符号思想中的意义问题》。载《基督教文化学刊》（第五十辑）。北京：宗教文化出版社，2023，第190-210页。[Qu, Ran, and Tu Youxiang. “The Problem of Meaning in St. Augustine’s Thought of the Sign”. In Journal for the Study of Christian Culture, volume 50, Beijing: China Religious Culture Publisher, 2023, pp. 190-210.]
王晓朝。《奥古斯丁对基督教释经学的重要贡献》。载《圣经文学研究》（第三辑）。北京：人民文学出版社，2009，第45-63页。[Wang, Xiaochao. “Augustine’s Important Contribution to Christian Biblical Interpretation”. In Journal for the Study of Biblical Literature, volume 3, Beijing: People’s Literature Publishing House, 2009, pp. 45-63.]
王晓朝。《奥古斯丁的“记号论”及其现代性》。载《云南大学学报（社会科学版）》2010年第6期，第3-9、93页。[Wang, Xiaochao. “Augustine's 'Semiotics' and Its Modernity.” In Journal of Yunnan University (Social Sciences Edition), no. 6 (2010), pp. 3-9, 93.]
虞格仁。《基督教爱观研究》。台北市基督教中华文字差传协会翻译小组译。台北：道声出版社，2012。[Nygren, Anders. Agape and Eros. Translated by Christian Literature Program for China (CLPC). Taipei: Taosheng Publishing House, 2012.]
张帅。《论奥古斯丁解释学思想中的符号功能问题》。载《基督宗教研究》（第三十二辑）。北京：宗教文化出版社，2022，第105-118页。[Zhang, Shuai. “On the Function of symbols in the Biblical hermeneutics of Augustine”. In Study of Christianity, volume 32, Beijing: China Religious Culture Publisher, 2022, pp. 105-118.]
张帅。《奥古斯丁的〈圣经〉解释学研究——以爱为原则的阐释》。博士学位论文，武汉大学，2019。[Zhang, Shuai. “The Research on Augustine’s Biblical Hermeneutics——Explained around the principle of charity.” PhD diss., Wuhan University, 2019.]
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.